🔗 Share this article

EPA

Spain's Attorney General, the country's chief legal officer, has been forced to resign after being found guilty of disclosing classified details in a highly contentious case that has intensified political divisions within the country.

Judicial Decision and Sanctions

The highest court determined that García Ortiz had unlawfully revealed details about the tax situation of businessman a prominent business figure, who is the boyfriend of a leading opposition figure.

The court imposed a two-year ban from his position and a penalty of €7,200. Additionally, he must compensate ten thousand euros to Mr González Amador as restitution.

Political Fallout

The legal proceedings of the attorney general fueled the already acrimonious relationship between the progressive administration of the nation's leader and the right-wing opposition.

Divergent viewpoints were underlined by responses to the guilty verdict.

"The prime minister must apologise to the Spanish people, resign and schedule new elections, in that sequence," said a spokesperson for the main opposition party.

The administration stated it disagreed with the ruling but acknowledged it and would proceed with the appointment of a replacement prosecutor.

Judicial Dispute

Nevertheless, numerous progressive lawmakers expressed outrage at what they perceived as a politically motivated ruling.

A cabinet member, of the Sumar party, stated the conviction dealt a "devastating impact to the principle of innocent until proven guilty" and compromised citizens' rights when it came to the rule of law.

Origins of the Matter

The complex case dates back to spring of 2024, when the prosecutor's department issued a official statement indicating that Mr González Amador had requested a plea bargain after being discovered avoiding tax obligations worth €350,951.

The document rectified inaccurate media coverage stating that the prosecutor's department had proposed the bargain.

The origin of the incorrect reports was the communications director of the regional leader of Madrid.

Legal Proceedings

The businessman lodged a legal action against the chief prosecutor, claiming his privacy had been breached. The case against García Ortiz also saw him accused of leaking information about the matter to the media.

Legal authorities highlighted the prosecutor's decision to replace his mobile device as suspicious.

Yet, there was no direct evidence connecting García Ortiz to the leak and several journalists stated under oath during the trial that he had not provided information of their reporting.

Concerning the press statement, the attorney general stated he was simply correcting the inaccurate information.

The attorney general can appeal against the ruling.

Broader Political Context

This comes as a significant setback for the prime minister, who has been facing legal scrutiny on multiple issues.

• A family member is scheduled for court proceedings for influence peddling
• His wife is being examined for her commercial dealings
• Two former senior figures in the Socialist Party are accused of managing a large-scale corruption operation