🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold forecast – not just the winner overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally frequently! I felt somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of ballots added later and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world in which yesterday went somewhat badly for him, where the opponent was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner added 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously backed Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the election was the record participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he does because then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That really surprised me. The independent kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents all went for the independent. So there existed some opposition. However no, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. Plus, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from progressives come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – candidates will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that every city in America could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities exist.